|
Captive Resource Center
Businesses and Associations
Research & Information
|
Weasel Words Weaken Claims Processing
by Gary Blake
Director
The Communication Workshop
| Gary Blake is the director of The Communication
Workshop, a Port Washington, NY-based consulting firm offering on-site
seminars in Effective Business Writing for Claims, Loss Control, and
Underwriting Professionals. More information on this subject can be
found on The Communication Workshops web site:
www.writingworkshop.com. Dr. Blake may be reached at garyblake@aol.com
or by telephone: (516) 767-9590. |
The words you use in your claims correspondence define you and your insurance
company. They can spell the difference between maintaining good professional
relationships with claimants, regulators and attorneys, and straining
those relationships with wishy-washiness and lots of extra words.
"Wordiness" is defined as using unnecessary words to make a point. Instead
of writing: "This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of July 29,
1999," you could just write: "We've received your July 29th letter
."
Extra words, especially words that are stuffy, just weigh down a letter.
If you don't think wordiness is a big deal, consider this: 100 million
people are expected to be using e-mail by 2000, up from 66 million today.
The typical claims professional receives an average of 25 e-mails per
day. Many of the e-mails, sent and received, are filled with extra words
and could be cut in half if the writers were trained to write carefully
and care about the reader's attention span.
As I travel from insurance company to insurance company teaching claims
writing, I find that more than 80 percent of the letters I read have large
patches of wordinesswords that, with an extra moment's thought, you could
cut without losing a drop of meaning.
To guide you in cutting extra words from your sentences and paragraphs,
I'll give you some typical wordy phrases, each followed by a concise substitute
in parentheses:
A large number of (many).
Absolutely complete (complete).
After the conclusion of (after).
As a general rule (generally).
As you may or may not know (as you may know).
Can be in a position to (can).
Despite the fact that (although).
Due to the fact that (since, because).
During the course of (during).
Hold a meeting (meet).
In compliance with your request (at your request).
In a timely manner (soon).
In many cases (often).
In the event that (if).
In the majority of cases (often).
Make a recommendation that (recommend).
On a daily basis (daily).
Perform an analysis of (analyze).
Start off (start).
Hedging in your claims letters may seem second nature to you. After all,
you cannot be expected to be absolutely sure of everything being claimed
in a claim.
Yet that does not mean we should couch all of our statements in hedgy
language, using weasel words to buy some "wiggle room" between the truth
and our "understanding of the situation."
There are some situations that must be hedged because, clearly, the outcome
is out of your control. For example: You wrote: "I've mailed you a letter
and you should receive it Tuesday." You can't (unless you sent it via
a speedy delivery service) guarantee that it will be there Tuesday. So,
you could write: "I've mailed you a letter and you'll probably get it
on Tuesday." Weaker: "I've mailed you a letter and you may get it on Tuesday."
Good writing is authoritative. Maybe that's why all those non-fiction
bestsellers in the "How-To" category sell so wellthey make a promise.
No book would sell with the title "How To Possibly Win Friends and Often
Influence People." Your readers look to you as a source of authoritative
information.
If you are going to make a judgment or give an opinion, you should at
least tell your reader where you got that opinion.
For example, don't write: "It is my understanding that your claimant made
a right turn without signaling." Tell the reader your source of information:
"According to Bill Smith, who witnessed the accident, you made a left
turn without signaling."
The following list gives you weasel words and phrases to use sparingly:
About
Adequate
And/or
Appropriate
Approximately
As applicable
As circumstances dictate
As much as possible
As needed
As required
As soon as possible
At your earliest convenience
Basically
Depending on
Frequently
Good
If appropriate
If required
If warranted
In a timely manner
Indicated
In general
In most cases
In our opinion
In some cases
In most instances
It is our understanding
It may
Major
Make an effort to
Maybe
More or less
Normally
Often
On occasion
Perhaps
Primary
Relevant
Roughly
Should be
Sometimes
Striving for
Suitable
Tentatively
Try
Typically
Usually
Valid
We intend to
When necessary
When possible
When you use hedge words, you sound like you're being evasive even when
you don't intend to be.
While all the words and phrases on this list are real (that is, their
definitions can be found in the dictionary), they become problematic when
people overuse them. When that happens, people undermine their messages,
watering down their ideas and their authority.
Whenever you're tempted to use a hedgy word, first see if you can get
around the problem by using one of the following methods:
1) Do more research, so instead of making an educated guess, you have
definite information. For example, instead of saying, "It is my understanding
that the convention is in Anaheim on March 15," make a call, find out
for sure, and write: "The convention will be in Anaheim on March 15."
2) If authoritative information is difficult to obtain, at least give
your reader the source on which you've based your ideas: "According to
Tom, who'll be an exhibitor, the convention will be in Anaheim on March
15."
3) Instead of qualifying a thought with a phrase such as "when warranted"
or "if appropriate" or "in most cases," be specific. Do not write, "If
appropriate, we send our reports in 10" x 13" envelopes." Instead, write,
"When reports are more than 20 pages, we send them in 10" x 13" envelopes."
If you think your claims department letters are not hedgy, consider these
snippets from a single claims letter written by an adjuster at a major
insurer:
"I will try to discuss these issues in this letter
It is my understanding
that
Although I cannot confirm the extent of the project, it appears
assuming the above to be accurate
I am advised that
presumably
To the extent that these events did occur
It appears the bathroom could
be repaired for $100
I have no knowledge as to why it is alleged to have
warped
Thus it is hard to comment upon whether this would be covered
I believe the above covers all of the damage I am aware of."
This masterpiece of hedging belongs in the Guinness Book of World Records
as hedgiest insurance letter ever written, or "maybe" it's more typical
than we know!
Gary Blake is a Port Washington, N.Y.-based writing consultant who presents
onsite writing seminars for claims and other Insurance professionals.
He is the Author of "The Elements of Business Writing" (Macmillan).
He welcomes E-mails at garyblake@aol.com
or visit his web site at www.writingworkshop.com.
Reproduced from National
Underwriter Property & Casualty/Risk & Benefits Management Edition,
May 29, 2000.
Copyright © 2000 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication.
All rights reserved.
Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.
|